On Tue, 2008-06-03 at 21:05 +0200, Christian Hoff wrote: > I'm really frustrated about Gtk#. By now I have found 4 > bugs(TreeModelFilter.ModifyFunc, broken SetValue methods, GType of > *Adapter classes wrong, virtual methods ignored by object genratable) > just by development. I have created patches for two of these and need > further info to create one for the "GType of the *Adapter classes" bug. > One patch has already made it to SVN, the other one is for a bug that > hasn't even been assigned since more than 1 week and until now I haven't > gotten the info I need to create the third patch.
Sorry about that. I appreciate your efforts on providing patches. I saw the TreeModelFilter patch land over the weekend, and meant to comment on it. As you indicated in your comments, it still needs some work and I needed to spend some time investigating to give you appropriate feedback. > I have also created a new feature for Gtk#(GObject property > registration) and sent a patch to the mailing list 8 days ago; I didn't > get any feedback on it. This one I don't remember seeing, can you attach it to a bug or send it to me directly. > That all costed me hell of a lot time (about eight hours for two weeks > just for Gtk#) to create bug reports and the new feature. I don't blame > you that I had to do so; this is free software that lives from its > community(and the generous support of Novell). But by ignoring the > patches you are implicitly telling me that my work(and community efforts > in general) are not appreciated. That's one interpretation. Another is that our team is very small, taking on an enormous development space, and occasionally we drop the ball on some patch review. I am certainly not ignoring your patches. At the moment, I've been focusing on MonoDevelop, my other job on the mono team. Again, I apologize that your patches haven't gotten the swift attention they should have. > I did already write 3 posts to the mailing list and didn't get a reply; > please prove that you can do better by commenting on this post and > telling me what will happen to the GObject patch ;-) The number of active contributors to the list is pretty small, and you are asking some fairly difficult questions. If you are an irc user, feel free to drop into #monodev on gimpnet at any time and ask questions. I'm in there 8-10 hours a day on weekdays as user mkestner. Sometimes bugzilla and mailing lists just sit a while every now and then. It's certainly not because we don't care about your contributions. I'll comment on your bug reports this afternoon. Thanks, Mike _______________________________________________ Gtk-sharp-list maillist - Gtk-sharp-list@lists.ximian.com http://lists.ximian.com/mailman/listinfo/gtk-sharp-list
