On Mon, 2005-02-21 at 11:24 +0100, Roel Vanhout wrote: > Murray Cumming wrote: > > On Fri, 2005-02-18 at 20:03 +0100, Murray Cumming wrote: > >>I don't expect there to be many > >>meaningful comments that would not be quickly put into the the original > >>documentation, even if I'm forced to do it myself. > > Actually I disagree with myself now after looking at the php comments. > > Do you mean that as in 'there aren't many useful comments' or as in > 'there will be so many useful comments that it will be hard to > incorporate them all'?
The later. > Anyway, I've put the patch, new file and description in the gtkmm > bugzilla (http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=168030). The > description on how to get it working is short and assumes some basic > knowledge on how to set up a php/mysql application, if I need to clarify > things just add comments to the bugzilla. > > I've noted it already in the bugzilla entry but I'll repeat it here to > be sure: I have not tested the makefile.am patch because I don't have an > automake environment. But what I mean is clear I think, so anyone with > basic automake knowledge should be able to correct any syntactical mistakes. Thanks very much. I'll investigate that. I also want to investigate what mono uses/used, in case it is more convenient. -- Murray Cumming [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.murrayc.com www.openismus.com _______________________________________________ gtkmm-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtkmm-list
