Maybe libsigc++ was GPL and libsigc++ 2 is LGPL? libpropc++ might be a modified version of the first version, although, I wouldn't have thought somebody could just relicense code, it would have to be the original author, which maybe the case since I hear he doesn't hack on version two.
Gaz > -----Original Message----- > From: Kresimir Sojat [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] > Sent: 18 August 2005 11:16 > To: [email protected] > Subject: Libpropc++ > > I was just playing around on sourgeforge and found the > http://sourceforge.net/projects/glib-bind. Part of this project is > libpropc++ and in its documentation > (http://ex-code.com/propcpp/PR-short.html) says: > > Libpropc++ provides a partial reimplementation of libsigc++. Use this > reimplementation if you want to use libpropc++ to write commercial > software because the license of libsigc++ requires any software using > libsigc++ to be open source. > > Is this statement true? Becouse i don't use gtkmm/sigc++ to develop > open source software, and on http://gtkmm.org/license.shtml says: > > Note that this license does not require you to release the source code > of your own applications or libraries and does not require you to pay > any fees. > > I am realy confused now. > _______________________________________________ > gtkmm-list mailing list > [email protected] > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtkmm-list > _______________________________________________ gtkmm-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtkmm-list
