> Hi, > Why would Glib::Module exist if it isn't usable? And if I am correct > your talking of linux enviroment and I am developing on a windows > machine. But that wouldn't be a problem if you use Glib::Module. I want > to port my app to llinux when I am done thats why I use xxxmm where I > can. And C++ because its easy readable. I think there wasn't one line of > my (somewhat stupid) code you did't understand. For starters what does > the python script? Is that realy needed for a c++ progrram? What you say > about the standard search paths, why would it, I said my app loads the > module correct with no error when I call 'get_last_error()' only the > get_symbol() calling doesn't work. And please never but never again say > 'that can't be done in c++' because everything that in c can be done in c++! I think you are wrong here. Not everything that can be done in C can be done in C++. Just think about automatic signal connection in libglade and libglademm. In C++ signal handlers (Gtk+'s signals) usually is a method of an object. In C it's a function. The problem here is that autoconnection can be done only if you are using C-style handlers (`get_symbol' on you executable) or if language has reflection mechanisms (like in Java or Common Lisp).
Signal handler autoconnection in C++ in a general way is impossible. -- WBR, Max Vasin. _______________________________________________ gtkmm-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtkmm-list
