Send Gtkmm-forge mailing list submissions to
        [EMAIL PROTECTED]

To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
        https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gtkmm-forge
or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
        [EMAIL PROTECTED]

You can reach the person managing the list at
        [EMAIL PROTECTED]

When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific
than "Re: Contents of Gtkmm-forge digest..."


gtkmm-forge is the mailing list that receives gtkmm bug reports from bugzilla.  
A daily digest is sent to gtkmm-main, to encourage people to help fixing the 
bugs. Do not try to unsubscribe gtkmm-forge from gtkmm-list.


Today's Topics:

   1. [Bug 319702] New: Remove link from Additional Resources page (gtkmm 
(bugzilla.gnome.org))

--__--__--

Message: 1
From: "gtkmm (bugzilla.gnome.org)" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Date: Mon, 24 Oct 2005 23:43:24 -0400 (EDT)
Subject: [gtkmm bugzilla] [Bug 319702] New: Remove link from Additional 
Resources page

Do not reply to this via email (we are currently unable to handle email
responses and they get discarded).  You can add comments to this bug at
http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D319702
 gtkmm | general | Ver: unspecified

           Summary: Remove link from Additional Resources page
           Product: gtkmm
           Version: unspecified
          Platform: Other
        OS/Version: Linux
            Status: UNCONFIRMED
          Severity: minor
          Priority: Normal
         Component: general
        AssignedTo: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
        ReportedBy: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
                CC: [EMAIL PROTECTED]


I would just like you to know that the application OpenLDev on your Addit=
ional
Resources page under "Applications using gtkmm" no longer uses Gtkmm.

Of course, I feel that I should offer an explaination for the move. This =
is not
meant to be an insult to the Gtkmm developer in any way. My problem is th=
at with
a larger application, Gtkmm adds too much overhead (my executable size cu=
t by
half when I switched to Gtk+). Also, the Gtkmm sources weren't updated in=
 apt at
the time.

This just means that I don't want to use it for OpenLDev, though. With sm=
aller
apps, I think Gtkmm is perfect for any C++ developer and I loved using it=
. To be
quite honest, Gtk+ is such a larger pain in the butt, especially using it=
 with C++.

Keep up the great work with Gtkmm and I hope there aren't any hard feelin=
gs from
what I said ... :] - Andrew Krause

------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.



--__--__--

_______________________________________________
Gtkmm-forge mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gtkmm-forge


End of Gtkmm-forge Digest
_______________________________________________
gtkmm-list mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtkmm-list

Reply via email to