> >I believe that programming language independent and cross-platform > >descriptions/declerations of GUIs using some XML-dialect (Glade-XML, > >XUL, or spare me, even XAML) are the future. Such descriptions can be > >loaded at runtime by some toolkit specific loader and hereby have the > >advantage of being independant of the underlying GUI-toolkit > >(GTKmm/libglademm, GTK/libglade, QT/? or whatever) and hence are more > >likely to be reused.</truism> That said, there are a few XML-dialects > >trying to become the 'de facto' standard of which Glade-XML is our > >favorite, of course! So why not support Glade-XML as adding yet another > >format is not going to help the Glade-XML case? > > Hmm... where do they sell the Glade-XML koolaide anyways? > > Bob
What do you mean? ( http://dictionary.reference.com/search?q=koolaide yields nothing.. ) _______________________________________________ gtkmm-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtkmm-list
