On 3/2/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > reasonable person. It's not worth wasting > any time (that might more usefully be spent > documenting something ...) on trying to > persuade authors to agree to change the > license on their work to something that meets > Debian's ideological-purity standards.
For what it's worth, my question / suggestion had nothing to do with idealogical purity, as I've not really taken the time to dig deeply into the FDL and determine whether it's problematic or not. My suggestion was put forward for purely practical reasons (i.e. keeping the documentation in the main Debian repository). But that said, I'm fine with waiting to see what the outcome is before we spend any time or effort trying to get the license changed. Jonner _______________________________________________ gtkmm-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtkmm-list
