У сре, 12. 04 2006. у 11:10 +0200, Murray Cumming пише: > On Wed, 2006-04-12 at 10:38 +0200, Armin Burgmeier wrote: > > Murray Cumming wrote: > > > No length output argument should be necessary or useful anyway. > > > > > Do the methods have to be defined manually rather than using > > _WRAP_METHOD then? Or is there some possibility to tell gmmproc to > > ignore the size parameter and pass NULL to the underlaying GTK+ function? > > No, this must be done manually. gmmproc is not that clever. >
I created a patch for this today, it's in bugzilla. Marko _______________________________________________ gtkmm-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtkmm-list
