[snip] On Fri, Jun 30, 2006 at 02:05:12PM -0500, Bob Caryl wrote: > Hello all, > > and because I have a phobia about my executables being > dependent on "load files"
I always thought taht keeping such files "outside" the binary is better. I'm not trying to say that my approach is better than your approach. I'm just trying to understand the reasons behind your point of view of possible! > > http://users/nehp.net/rcaryl/xmltocsource-0.09.tar.gz http://users.nehp.net/rcaryl/xmltocsource-0.09.tar.gz ;-) -- GNU/Linux registered user #224950 Proud Egyptian GNU/Linux User Group <www.eglug.org> Member. Life powered by Debian, Homepage: www.foolab.org -- Don't send me any attachment in Micro$oft (.DOC, .PPT) format please Read http://www.gnu.org/philosophy/no-word-attachments.html Preferable attachments: .PDF, .HTML, .TXT Thanx for adding this text to Your signature
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ gtkmm-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtkmm-list
