On Sat, 2006-09-09 at 19:28 -0500, Paul Davis wrote: > Rose, > > On a side note, as a purely form of programming recommendation, there > should almost never be a reason to create a pointer to a smart > pointer. (Invariably, there's got to be an exception to the case but > I've never come across one yet)
had to do this 3 weeks ago for a lock-free data structure system based on a read-copy-update system. :) _______________________________________________ gtkmm-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtkmm-list
