On Mon, 2006-10-09 at 23:10 -0500, Nickolai Dobrynin wrote: > So, assume the following scenario. I send the delete signal to the > window by clicking on the X. > By default, this should get the window destroyed, correct?
No, the "destroy_event" signal is badly named. It is a request to close the window. It says nothing about the memory management of the objects in your application. > If the way I initially allocated the window > was by using the 'new' operator, would "destroy", in this particular > context mean that the C++ > pointer has been invalidated, as well, just like the underlying GTK+ > instance? No. http://www.gtkmm.org/docs/gtkmm-2.4/docs/tutorial/html/ch22.html [snip] > ...which means that the documentation that Maik brought up at > the > beginning of this thread should really be changed so that it > doesn't > mention anything about Gtk::Widget::Destroy() (which doesn't > exist) > but instead tell people to 'delete' the widget in the normal C > ++ way. -- Murray Cumming [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.murrayc.com www.openismus.com _______________________________________________ gtkmm-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtkmm-list
