On 11/26/06, Pierre THIERRY <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Scribit Milosz Derezynski dies 26/11/2006 hora 17:00: > In fact i was thinking of abstracting the singals out of the core > libhal++ library so it could be optionally used with Qt signalling Maybe a build option would be interesting, to produce either a libhal++-sigc++, libhal++-qt or libhal++-boost...
With this, the library would be fixed to a single signaling system and i don't think that it's a good idea to do that; having the signaling being actually an additional layer that can be provided by a supplemental library (which sounds a little bit far-off-spaced for now but it's doable), would be much more beneficial, so that gtkmm apps could link to libhalcc and libhalcc-signals-sigc, and qt apps to libhalcc and libhalcc-signals-qt, etc.. Milosz
_______________________________________________ gtkmm-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtkmm-list
