On 2/24/07, Jonathon Jongsma <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 2/24/07, Paul Davis <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On Sat, 2007-02-24 at 08:21 -0600, Paul Davis wrote: > > > > > Hey, > > > > > > I was the one that started that project. I happened to have a bit of > > > misfortune and ended up starting it just before some major api changes > > > in goocanvas. Since then my priorities have changed a bit and I'm not > > > working on any projects that I would want to use goocanvasmm for. > > > > > > If anyone wants to take over as the maintainer for it, let me know and > > > I'll be glad to transfer ownership or whatever is required. I'd quite > > > like it in the future, but at the moment I just haven't got time to > > > work on it. > > > > i've been talking with damon chapin over on the cairo list. it is very > > likely that Ardour will adopt goocanvas as our new canvas after we > > release 2.0. if that happens, then i will be happy to take over the > > maintainer role for the *mm wrappers, and thus add to the world's > > confusion over our identity: > > > > "Wait, I thought Paul Davis was the maintainer" > > "No, not any more" > > "Well who is" > > "The other Paul Davis" > > > > this won't happen for another couple of months at least, though. > > ha, that's pretty good. > > In any case, it turns out that I already have commit access to > libgoocanvasmm, even though I've never used it in the past. I fixed > one tiny bug just now, and I'm attaching a larger patch that wraps the > GooCanvas object as Goocanvas::Canvas and makes changes to the simple > example to make it match the simple example shipped with goocanvas and > so that it will compile. So I now have the simple example working in > my working copy. > It also fixes a minor API change for Goocanvas::Item that was made in > goocanvas on Feb 13 (2 days after murray updated to the new API > apparently). I just updated the .defs file by hand, because I'm still > pretty clueless when it comes to this gmmproc .defs stuff. > > Anybody object to me pushing this out? > > Also, does anybody object to me getting rid of the patched copy of > goocanvas in the goocanvasmm repository and re-arranging things a bit > so that what's now in trunk/libgoocanvasmm is just in trunk/? It > doesn't appear that the patched version of goocanvas is necessary > anymore (I didn't use it when doing these changes). > > Also, just to make this clear, I'm not volunteering for maintainership > of this library, i'm still just playing around -- I don't know whether > I'll end up using it or not :) > > -- > jonner > >
Yeah, that patched version needs to get trashed. I had it around for some reason I can't fathom at the moment and its causing a bit of confusion being there. Paul _______________________________________________ gtkmm-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtkmm-list
