On Sun, 2007-08-19 at 18:13 -0400, Paul Davis wrote: > > I can understand if gtkmm-2.4 corresponds to gtk+ 2.9, but having > > gtkmm-2.4 correspond to gtkmm 2.10 makes no sense whatsoever. > > I am not going to defend the naming convention, because i think its > silly too. However, I as explaining to you what it was. > > gtkmm-2.4 : API version > gtkmm 2.10 : release version
It's confusing at first, yes. I don't know of any better alternative given the need to change the API version name between 2.2 and 2.4. > the difference is small, subtle and IMHO silly. but that *is* the > difference. [snip] -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.murrayc.com www.openismus.com _______________________________________________ gtkmm-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtkmm-list
