On Tue, 2007-12-04 at 13:28 -0500, José Alburquerque wrote: > Murray Cumming wrote: > > I think we should do this in C++ much as it is done in C: > > - We should have an add_watch(priority) that just causes the signal to > > be emitted. > > and > > - We should have an add_watch(slot) that provides a sigc::slot that is > > called. We have lots of these set_func(slot)-like functions in gtkmm. > > > > As I stepped away a bit, I was just about to write that the > gst_bus_add_watch() method could be wrapped (it just hit me). This what > you're saying and the light bulb in my head says this makes sense. Can > I make modifications? As you say, this message signal patch would not > be useful. Thanks.
I haven't committed any of these patches yet, so please feel free to give me a new patch to commit instead. Many thanks, of course. -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.murrayc.com www.openismus.com _______________________________________________ gtkmm-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtkmm-list
