Hi, Am Dienstag, den 08.01.2008, 01:25 +0000 schrieb Chris Vine:
> Ah, it is in glibmm-2.6 that I have a tarball of here. That method is > invoked in the destructor of Glib::DispatchNotifier, because in that > version of glibmm, Glib:DispatchNotifier is not derived from > sigc::trackable. However that is not going to save you (any more than > sigc::trackable will) because as I have mentioned the > Glib::DispatchNotifier object appears to be a thread-local static > object, shared between all Glib::Dispatcher objects created in that > thread. Indeed it is, and has been that way since the initial implementation if I remember correctly. You are also correct about sigc::trackable vs explicit disconnection; the change doesn't have any user-visible effect. If I recall correctly we already had an exchange on the list about this very topic a while ago. I'll have to look it up, but from memory I think I didn't want to move to your alternative implementation because some of the design goals of Glib::Dispatcher would have had to be sacrificed; in particular the avoidance of mutex locking during normal operation. --Daniel _______________________________________________ gtkmm-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtkmm-list
