Hi,

Sorry those were because of my initial misunderstanding, I forgot, that I
need to make binding and use underlaying C functions. Now I have already
cleaned it up, we have no private member except one which refers to glibc
checksum. I have written the implementation also, now trying to compile and
soon I will add in svn so that it will be visible to you also.

-Br
Naveen

On Jan 16, 2008 10:13 PM, Murray Cumming <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>
> On Tue, 2008-01-15 at 11:25 +0200, Naveen Verma wrote:
> > I have added the the different types of checksum details as structure
> > in private section of checksum class. Would it be good if I make them
> > as class outside the checksum class, although they don't have any
> > functions?
>
> I don't understand how these should be used in the API, or why you have
> added private member variables.
>
> Maybe it would help if you talked about particular functions that you
> are trying to wrap:
> http://library.gnome.org/devel/glib/unstable/glib-Data-Checksums.html
>
> --
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> www.murrayc.com
> www.openismus.com
>
>
_______________________________________________
gtkmm-list mailing list
[email protected]
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtkmm-list

Reply via email to