I agree on these names, they sound sensible and also clear (notice for all not too familiar with gst: the GStreamer project itself refers to the main gstreamer package/library as "core", so "corelibs" and "coreplugins" seem to make sense).
2008/3/21, José Alburquerque <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > Hi. I'm noticing that there are some things in gstreamer which > we haven't contemplated wrapping in gstreamermm yet and I was wondering > how we might go about this: > > 1) In the gstreamer source directory, besides the gst directory (which > we've mostly wrapped), there is a libs/gst directory with other > directories such as base, check, controller, etc. which are not wrapped > (the docs for these are at: > > http://gstreamer.freedesktop.org/data/doc/gstreamer/head/gstreamer-libs/html/ > ). > > 2) In the gstreamer source directory there's also a plugin directory > with other directories (namely elements and indexers) which are also not > wrapped (the docs for these are at: > > http://gstreamer.freedesktop.org/data/doc/gstreamer/head/gstreamer-plugins/html/ > ). > > 3) The gstreamer gst-plugins-base module has a directory named > gst-libs/gst with items (including a few interfaces which I mentioned in > post: > http://mail.gnome.org/archives/gtkmm-list/2008-February/msg00201.html) > that may also be beneficial to wrap (the docs for these are found at: > > http://gstreamer.freedesktop.org/data/doc/gstreamer/head/gst-plugins-base-libs/html/ > ). > > Finally, > > 4) The gst-plugins-base module also has directories named gst and ext > which contain gstreamer base plugins (the docs for these are at: > > http://gstreamer.freedesktop.org/data/doc/gstreamer/head/gst-plugins-base-plugins/html/ > ). > > (I'm not sure that these should be wrapped, but I thought I should > include them in this list for completeness.) > > What I'm trying to figure out is: would it be necessary to make > subdirectories in gstreamermm/gstreamer or in gstreamermm (the main > directory)? I know that if the directories are created under the main > gstreamermm directory these would probably represent namespaces and I'm > not sure if I have to be precise in choosing good names and what these > names should be. I thought that names could be as follows: for 1) > corelibs, for 2) coreplugins, for 3) baselibs and for 4) baseplugins. > Are these names ok? I'm thinking of adding these directories so that > what's necessary can also be wrapped. Thanks. > > -- > José Alburquerque > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > _______________________________________________ > gtkmm-list mailing list > [email protected] > http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtkmm-list >
_______________________________________________ gtkmm-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtkmm-list
