On Wednesday 07 May 2008 2:16:10 pm Murray Cumming wrote: > On Wed, 2008-05-07 at 10:00 +0300, Ionutz Borcoman wrote: > > and I'm tired of waiting for an answer on a mailing > > list, answer that might never come, > > I've looked in the archive, and I can only find three questions from > you. Only your recent (on Saturday) email about treeview drag and drop) > has not yet had an answer. It's rather unclear but I'll do my best again > to parse it. > > Of course, not every question gets an answer, though most do if you post > a reminder later, and if they are clear and concise.
I understand that. I'm also trying again your D&D tree example from the tutorial, as I might have missed something. > Sorry, we really can't directly help to improve a book that we didn't > write. The author would probably welcome feedback. It was a general remark over the GTK/GTKmm docs. The GTKmm tutorial is quite good and gets you started. But as everybody knows, it's the final 20% of an app that takes 80% of the effort :-) > Our online book has a small section about Gtk::Frame, though there > really isn't much to say about it because it's such a simple container: > http://www.gtkmm.org/docs/gtkmm-2.4/docs/tutorial/html/chapter-container-wi >dgets.html#sec-single-item-containers The GTK frame was just an example. The GTK book author was stressing a lot that you should really learn what he taught about containers, because he is not going to repeat that, but he totally ignored frames. That pissed me a little :-) Cheers, Johnny _______________________________________________ gtkmm-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtkmm-list
