On Tue, 2008-05-13 at 11:17 +0200, Murray Cumming wrote: > On Mon, 2008-05-12 at 18:23 -0400, Paul Davis wrote: > > i think that in general, signal_bar() would like to know that the > > handlers it is calling do not destroy the objects they are invoked > > upon. > > I believe that fixing that was a design aim for libsigc++ 2, which we > are now using. I believe it works. I personally avoid it, however, just > to keep things simple.
It was fixed from libsigc++-1.2.3 onwards. As it happens, it also worked with libsigc++-1.0. Chris _______________________________________________ gtkmm-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtkmm-list
