On Tue, 2008-08-12 at 15:12 -0500, John Hobbs wrote: > I agree! That is a decidedly non-trivial solution, and though it's > now in the list archives, I think it should be somewhere more obvious.
A documentation patch would be welcome, in bugzilla, please. At the least, please file a bug with the text that you think should be added to the documentation. > We could start some kind of database of little snippets of gtkmm code > like that. What do you think? Make it cover multiple libraries? Maybe > mm-snippets.org? There is already a wiki that everyone can edit, adding linked sub-pages where appropriate: http://live.gnome.org/gtkmm But in general I would prefer to have things documented properly in the actual gtkmm documentation. > For the maintainers, does that sound like a useful thing or something > counter productive? I'd be happy to write and run it, no sweat off > your backs. I'll even watch the list closer for useful things, I read > it pretty regularly anyway. I've gotten so much out of gtkmm I'd like > to give back a little. -- [EMAIL PROTECTED] www.murrayc.com www.openismus.com _______________________________________________ gtkmm-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtkmm-list
