Sorry one addendum: when I said The reasoning for even considering this system is so that we can potentially > put away with the custom constructor for derived widgets, and make it > possible to allow custom constructors (albeit the > constructor still needs access to an instance of Gnome::Glade::Xml somehow, > which can be of course easily passed through a parameter to it).
then of course the point was to say: we can put away with the *fixed mandatory custom constructors* for derived widgets, and allow any kinds of args (as long as you also pass a Gnome::Glade::Xml through it). Cheers! M.
_______________________________________________ gtkmm-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtkmm-list
