On Wed, 2009-10-21 at 20:44 +0200, Armin Burgmeier wrote: > On Wed, 2009-10-21 at 20:33 +0200, Murray Cumming wrote: > > On Wed, 2009-10-21 at 19:14 +0200, Armin Burgmeier wrote: > > > Is anyone keen on a Windows installer for gtkmm 2.18? There is no GTK+ > > > bundle yet, and Tor Lillqvist, the GTK+ Win32 maintainer, says this is > > > because GTK+ 2.18 is still quite buggy on Windows (e.g. does not support > > > the native Windows theme). As there are invidual zip packages for GTK+ > > > 2.18 I can still create an installer if people think we/they need one. I > > > think it's not too useful at the moment. > > > > If GTK+ 2.18 is not good enough on Windows then I don't see much point > > in a gtkmm 2.18 on Windows. Unless you just want to get more attention > > for that bug. What's the bug URL? > > This is for the theme not working: > https://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=598299 > > Otherwise gtk-demo seems to work well, though others have reported that > their applications behave badly with GTK+ 2.18.
But without filing bugs? It sounds like a gtkmm 2.18 installer would indeed be useful, and it sounds like Tor should be encouraged to do a GTK+ installer. That would mean that we all had the same stuff to work with, so we could get some real information about those bugs. -- [email protected] www.murrayc.com www.openismus.com _______________________________________________ gtkmm-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtkmm-list
