On Tue, 30 Mar 2010 22:54:26 +0200 Fabien Parent <[email protected]> wrote:
> __cplusplus is not something new from c++0x, it is already there in c++98. > Here come a quote from the c++ 98 standard paper: > "_ _cplusplus The name _ _cplusplus is defined to the value 199711L > when compiling a C++ > translation unit." > What I said is still true: gcc doesn't follow the c++98 standard > closely. At least in gcc 4.4 shipped in debian sid. There is a 9 year old bug about this: http://gcc.gnu.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=1773 Alexander _______________________________________________ gtkmm-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtkmm-list
