I meant gtkmm 2.90.2 of course. On Thu, 2010-06-10 at 10:02 +0200, Murray Cumming wrote: > *** gtkmm 2.90: > > gtkmm 2.90 wraps GTK+ 2.90. It is the gtkmm-3.0 ABI and installs in parallel > with the gtkmm-2.4 ABI, of which gtkmm 2.20 is currently the latest version. > This allows application developers to start using it when they choose to, > without being forced, and without breaking existing installed applications. > > gtkmm-3.0 will be mostly API-compatible with gtkmm-2.4, though some small > changes will be needed in application source code. > > The decision to do this ABI-break was not ours. We are forced to do it by > GTK+'s > decision to do a ABI-breaking GTK+ 3.0. However, we will take the > opportunity to fix some small issues. > > Note that a gtkmm 2.21/22 is still planned, which may have small API > additions. > > gtkmm stays in-sync with GTK+ by following the official GNOME release > schedule: > http://www.gnome.org/start/unstable/ > > Bindings for the rest of the GNOME Platform are also available, and are also > API-stable. > > http://www.gtkmm.org > > > *** Changes > > 2.90.2 (unstable): > > Gdk: > * Display: Remove list_devices() and get_core_pointer() because > they are now deprecated in GTK+. > * DragContext: Rename get_targets() to list_targets(). > Remove accessors for some (now hidden) struct fields. > * Image: > - Rename get_bpp() to get_bytes_per_pixel(). > - Rename get_bpl() to get_bytes_per_line(). > - Added get_depth(). > (Murray Cumming) > > Gtk: > * Box: Remove the children() list because it used a struct field and struct > type > that are now hidden. > * ProgressBar: Remove the unnused ProgressBarStyle enum. > (Murray Cumming) > > > *** Development > > There is active discussion on the mailing list: > http://www.gtkmm.org/mailinglist.shtml > and in the #c++ channel on irc.gnome.org > >
-- [email protected] www.murrayc.com www.openismus.com _______________________________________________ gtkmm-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtkmm-list
