On Mon, 2010-06-14 at 13:56 +0200, Murray Cumming wrote: > On Tue, 2010-06-08 at 17:39 -0400, José Alburquerque wrote: > > On Thu, 2010-06-03 at 00:33 -0400, José Alburquerque wrote: > > > So I did a little to add to what Jonathon had already done. I hope it > > > was done right. I think there is some more API related to DBus which > > > might be worthwhile to wrap but I think that should be determined by > > > you, the experienced maintainers. I'd be happy to help if the API is > > > worth wrapping and someone else doesn't already want to work on that. > > > > I've been thinking about wrapping GVariant and I have some ideas I'd > > like to try out. I hope to submit a patch for review soon. > > That's very helpful. I haven't looked at it yet. Can we wrap it like > GValue? > > Maybe not. I see that it is reference-counted, though maybe not derived > from GObject, and I see no copy function. I wonder if we can avoid > having to use it with RefPtr.
My first thought was to wrap it like GValue. I'm still hoping it's possible. I'll know a little later today when I begin to implement. I think it might be possible to not use RefPtr if we can wrap it like GValue. -- José _______________________________________________ gtkmm-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtkmm-list
