On Thu, 2010-07-29 at 08:37 -0400, Paul Davis wrote: > > but to stress again: the key decision was to just leave sigc++ alone > in connection with gtkmm, which was easy for us since we already use > the "no GUI code in another thread" model.
(I haven't read the whole thread yet) But this libsigc++ issue is still an issue with gtkmm, right? -- [email protected] www.murrayc.com www.openismus.com _______________________________________________ gtkmm-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtkmm-list
