On Tue, 2010-05-18 at 21:41 +0200, Murray Cumming wrote: > In gtkmm 3.0, I'd like to remove the intermediate container types > because they just confuse people and make it necessary to read the > documentation: > http://library.gnome.org/devel/gtkmm-tutorial/unstable/sec-intermediate-types.html.en > > So, for instance, Gtk::FileChooser::get_uris() would return a > std::list<> or std::vector instead of a Glib::SListhandle<>: > http://library.gnome.org/devel/gtkmm/2.20/classGtk_1_1FileChooser.html#abe7450acc71c70b5f595f9e23224a24e > > I think people generally agree with me about this, but I'd like to hear > about any objections. > > Also, should we use std::list or std::vector? I suspect that std::vector > would be more useful.
Thanks to Krzesimir Nowak this is now done in gtkmm 3. We chose std::vector. You'll still see the old *Handle types in glibmm and pangomm, because we have not done an ABI break there yet. -- [email protected] www.murrayc.com www.openismus.com _______________________________________________ gtkmm-list mailing list [email protected] http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtkmm-list
