Hi,

That sounds great. I'll check back in a few weeks then.
Btw, would the patch in [1] meet the design requirements of gstreamermm? If
so, I'll try to implement this after you finish porting.

Cheers,
-Dirk

[1]: https://github.com/peper0/gstreamermm-plugins




On 7 June 2013 22:40, José Alburquerque <[email protected]> wrote:

> Hi.  For some reason my e-mail client failed to get this message so I'm
> replying from my gmail account.
>
> I've had the intention of porting gstreamermm to GStreamer-1.0 though I've
> not had all that much time to do it lately.  I've started some of it
> recently but stopped because I had a few other things that I've been
> working on.
>
> I will probably try again and see if I can get something done so there can
> be a release in a few of weeks, if possible.  You can check back then if
> you'd like.
>
>
> On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 7:06 AM, Dirk Van Haerenborgh <[email protected]>wrote:
>
>> Hi,
>>
>> I'd like to know if there's any intention of porting gstreamermm to
>> gstreamer 1.0. And, if so, what the current status thereof is.
>>
>> Furthermore, is there any documentation regarding generating plugin defs
>> and plugins with the tools in the repo (e.g. generate_plugin_gmmproc_file)?
>> I had started porting it myself some time earlier, but obviously the
>> sources have to be regenerated for gstreamer 1.0.
>>
>> Thanks,
>> -Dirk
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> gtkmm-list mailing list
>> [email protected]
>> https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtkmm-list
>>
>>
>
_______________________________________________
gtkmm-list mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtkmm-list

Reply via email to