C++11 lets us use this:
enum class SomeEnum
{
VALUE_A,
VALUE_B
}
instead of the old way:
enum SomeEnum
{
SOME_ENUM_VALUE_A,
SOME_ENUM_VALUE_B
}
So, you'd then use SomeEnum::VALUE_A instead of SOME_ENUM_VALUE_A.
That's nicer, avoids some namespace pollution, and also lets us declare
the type without defining it.
However, I guess we can't just replace enum with "enum class" without
breaking ABI, right? I don't mind so much about breaking API.
--
Murray Cumming
[email protected]
www.murrayc.com
_______________________________________________
gtkmm-list mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtkmm-list
