On Tue, 2017-04-04 at 15:09 +0100, Jonathan Wakely wrote: > On 4 April 2017 at 14:52, Murray Cumming wrote: > > Any ideas about how we should support C++17 in gtkmm-3.0 without > > losing > > C++11/14 compatibility and without breaking ABI? > > Replace all dynamic exception specifications with noexcept(false) (or > just no exception specification). That's not an ABI change.
That's great to know. I'll take care of that then. -- Murray Cumming murr...@murrayc.com www.murrayc.com _______________________________________________ gtkmm-list mailing list gtkmm-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtkmm-list
