On 2018-11-14 13:18, Kjell Ahlstedt wrote:
On 2018-11-13 19:46, Kasper Peeters wrote:
This has been a known problem for more than a year. The program that
publishes reference documentation for released modules at
https://developer.gnome.org/<module-name>/<version> is not compatible
with new versions of Doxygen.
Does anyone know who is in charge of this? Not having documentation
for large parts of gnome online is a sure way to lose users. I'm happy
to help, but I don't even know whom to contact (have posted to
[email protected] as well but no response so far).
Cheers,
Kasper
I see now that the issue that I linked to in my previous post has been
moved to
https://gitlab.gnome.org/Infrastructure/library-web/issues/12
Infrastructure/library-web is probably the right place to start
looking, especially the library-web/src/modtypes/htmlfiles.py file. I
think that's where our Doxygen-generated html files are transformed to
what's shown at developer.gnome.org. The htmlfiles.py file was last
updated in February 2014. Many recent commits to library-web have been
done by Frédéric Péters <[email protected]>.
/Kjell
Kasper, have you tried to find anyone that can fix the missing
documentation? Or have you tried to look into library-web yourself? It
would certainly be fine to have this problem fixed. I feel that I'm not
the right person to fix it. I've tested some local fixes in library-web,
as I've said in a comment and an attached patch in library-web issue
#12. Probably data/xslt/html2html.xsl and data/skin/doxygen.css need
some patching. I know very little about these types of files.
If this is not fixed, I suppose we will have to use an old version of
Doxygen when we generate documentation for tarballs. It's unfortunate
that library-web depends so much on the exact structure of the html
files that Doxygen generates.
/Kjell
_______________________________________________
gtkmm-list mailing list
[email protected]
https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtkmm-list
