You need to check the roll on times, top gear, 60 to 80.
GTS has one of the lowest 60 to 80 time of anyone. besides it's turning
a lot more RPM at the same speed than the ST, so it's in a better
part of the power band.
A buddy of mine has my copy of the mag. with the comparison between the two,
so I can't quote the times, but it's no contest... :>)
MPG, one gets 1 better than me, I get 1 better than the other.
Jim H
Range Jay wrote:
> I have an ST1100 in my fleet. I have never had to add oil between changes.
> Not once. And as for downshifting, huh!!??? The ST has more torque than the
> GTS. The GTS has the horsepower and is geared higher. It also gets better
> fuel economy and add the 7.3-gal. fuel tank, and the range is the longest of
> any sport-tourer on the market.
> Love the GTS, but I'll still defend my ST. If I had to give one up, it
> would probably not be the Honda.
>
> Jay
>
> In a message dated 1/31/01 5:15:00 PM, [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> << I hate to say anything, but two buddies of mine have ST1100s
> and when we went to Nova Scotia, neither of them used any
> oil. (4000 plus miles) Other ST owners say the same thing.
> However, I really roast them whenever we pass someone.
> They always downshift at least once, mostly twice... I usually
> don't.. >>
>
> Orange County, California
> Park Ranger R-115
> 1993-1998