Yeah, it's really unfortunate that so many users have had to swap out textsecure for something that may not have timely security fixes. My text messaging threat model is a pretty common one: I want the content encrypted but don't mind the trade-offs of graphing obvious social connections for being able to have reliable and rapid message delivery.

Right now, if I send my boyfriend a textsecure message, it could be hours before he receives it. Even when we're both actively connected to the internet. Why? There's no reason to make this reliability/graph-resistance trade-off in our case. To be clear, we both still use it, as there's no obvious alternative. For something that is (in practice) this unreliable/requires an internet connection, we could just use an OTR client like ChatSecure.

There are lots of issues with being constantly tethered to the internet also, which I feel are usually brushed aside.

The perils of early adoption sometimes include being disappointed in the mature product, I guess ;-⁠)

~Griffin



Pranesh Prakash wrote:
This seems to be the successor project, dedicated, afaics, solely to
SMS (i.e., dropping the data components from TextSecure, though I
might be wrong on this):

SMSSecure:
https://smssecure.org/
https://github.com/SMSSecure/SMSSecure

Given that TextSecure is now no better than WhatsApp (both do push
messaging, both use phone numbers as identities, both use the axolotl
ratchet, etc.), I don't really see a need to promote TextSecure over
WhatsApp for casual (not-at-high-risk) encryption.  SMSSecure, on the
other hand, does something that WhatsApp, WeChat, etc., can't.

~ Pranesh

Hans of Guardian <[email protected]> [2015-03-09 11:44:28 -0400]:

That's unfortunate. But it does keep with Whisper System's general way of operating: they focus on the part of the problem that they can handle well. I'm not surprised its quite hard to handle encrypted SMS in conjunction with internet-based encrypted messaging. But I'm guessing this will leave a lot of people without encrypted messaging. I looks like TextSecure is being positioned to compete with all the big time messaging apps out there, like WeChat, WhatsApp, etc.

.hc

On Mar 9, 2015, at 10:21 AM, Carol Waters wrote:

Despite this very nice explanation of why OWS is dumping SMS, there are users who still want/need this. Are there plans for a fork or for someone to keep/post an .apk of TS 2.6 for the future?
-Carol
--
PGP: 0x477258EC (2048 RSA)
PGP: 0x11191439 (4096 RSA)
https://key.ip6.li/pks/lookup?search=wish117%40gmail.com&op=index&fingerprint=on
XMPP: [email protected]
OTR: CB64B187 B7B87580 BB41C058 3A22F073 A841AC2D
_______________________________________________
List info: https://lists.mayfirst.org/mailman/listinfo/guardian-dev
To unsubscribe, email:  [email protected]




_______________________________________________
List info: https://lists.mayfirst.org/mailman/listinfo/guardian-dev
To unsubscribe, email:  [email protected]


_______________________________________________
List info: https://lists.mayfirst.org/mailman/listinfo/guardian-dev
To unsubscribe, email:  [email protected]

--
“Sometimes the questions are complicated and the answers are simple.”
― Dr. Seuss
_______________________________________________
List info: https://lists.mayfirst.org/mailman/listinfo/guardian-dev
To unsubscribe, email:  [email protected]

Reply via email to