On Thu, May 08, 2025 at 01:51:21PM -0500, Eric Blake via Libguestfs wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 23, 2025 at 04:06:44PM -0500, Eric Blake via Libguestfs wrote:
> > Still waiting on Red Hat's security team to decide if these get CVE
> > designations, but at this point, we consider the impact to be low
> > enough severity (easy to avoid if your server rejects malicious
> > clients by the use of TLS) and related enough that there is no longer
> > any need to embargo the second one.
> > 
> > I'll wait a bit longer to apply, to provide time to update the subject
> > lines according to whether we get CVEs assigned.
> > 
> > Eric Blake (2):
> >   server: Fix off-by-one for maximum block_status length [CVE-XXX]
> >   blocksize: Fix 32-bit overflow in .extents [CVE-XXXX]
> 
> These have now been assigned CVE identifiers.  CVE-2025-47711 is for
> the server error with any plugin returning .extents of 4G or more, and
> CVE-2025-47712 is for the blocksize filter bug on unaligned block
> status requests near 4G.
> 
> I am now in the process of applying the patches to mainline and
> backporting them to branches that are still in active use; I will send
> a followup mail with tests for vulnerable versions and version
> numbers/commit ids to be used to avoid the problems, along with a
> patch to docs/nbdkit-security.pod pointing to that eventual mail.

Thanks Eric.  The fixes are available in development version 1.43.7
and stable version 1.42.3.

Rich.

-- 
Richard Jones, Virtualization Group, Red Hat http://people.redhat.com/~rjones
Read my programming and virtualization blog: http://rwmj.wordpress.com
virt-builder quickly builds VMs from scratch
http://libguestfs.org/virt-builder.1.html
_______________________________________________
Libguestfs mailing list -- guestfs@lists.libguestfs.org
To unsubscribe send an email to guestfs-le...@lists.libguestfs.org

Reply via email to