I have the same issue, only mine, when I go to create a rule, I get this: [05/31/2016 12:52:46 PM] Error running: ufw insert 3 allow out from 10.15.7.101 port 22 to 10.15.7.149 > ERROR: Invalid position '3' [05/31/2016 12:48:00 PM] Incoming: Allow [05/31/2016 12:47:28 PM] Error running: ufw insert 3 allow in from 10.15.7.101 port 22 to 10.15.7.149 port 22 > ERROR: Invalid position '3' [05/31/2016 12:47:20 PM] Error running: ufw insert 2 allow in from 10.15.7.101 port 22 to 10.15.7.149 port 22 > ERROR: Invalid position '2' [05/31/2016 12:46:46 PM] Error running: ufw insert 1 allow in from 10.15.7.101 port 22 to 10.15.7.149 port 22 > ERROR: Invalid position '1' [05/31/2016 12:46:45 PM] Error running: ufw insert 1 allow in from 10.15.7.101 port 22 to 10.15.7.149 port 22 > ERROR: Invalid position '1' [05/31/2016 12:46:44 PM] Error running: ufw insert 1 allow in from 10.15.7.101 port 22 to 10.15.7.149 port 22 > ERROR: Invalid position '1' [05/31/2016 12:46:42 PM] Error running: ufw insert 1 allow in from 10.15.7.101 port 22 to 10.15.7.149 port 22 > ERROR: Invalid position '1' [05/31/2016 12:46:23 PM] Error running: ufw insert 1 allow in from 10.15.7.101 port 22 to 10.15.7.149 port 22 > ERROR: Invalid position '1' [05/31/2016 12:43:33 PM] Error running: ufw insert 1 allow in from 10.15.7.101 to 10.15.7.149 > ERROR: Invalid position '1' [05/31/2016 12:43:09 PM] Error running: ufw insert 1 allow in on wlan0 from 10.15.7.101 to 10.15.7.149 > ERROR: Invalid position '1' [05/31/2016 12:43:07 PM] Error running: ufw insert 1 allow in on wlan0 from 10.15.7.101 to 10.15.7.149 > ERROR: Invalid position '1' [05/31/2016 12:43:04 PM] Error running: ufw insert 1 allow in on wlan0 from 10.15.7.101 to 10.15.7.149 > ERROR: Invalid position '1' [05/31/2016 12:35:53 PM] Error running: ufw insert 1 allow in on wlan0 from 10.15.7.101 to 10.15.7.149 > ERROR: Invalid position '1'
What's up with this, or can I somehow import the rule from another machine so this one will work correctly....look forward to your help....Thank you -- You received this bug notification because you are a member of Gufw Developers, which is subscribed to Gufw. https://bugs.launchpad.net/bugs/1540077 Title: Gufw not accepting subnet range in advanced firewall rule Status in Gufw: New Bug description: This is observed in Gufw v14.04.2 LTS. Creating a rule with a subnet in the 'from' field of an advanced rule results in an error. The example would be a requirement to only allow hosts in the same subnet to have access to a particular service (e.g. RDP) and so the 'from' field would be set to a subnet of 192.168.0.0/24. Attempting to add the rule results in an error in the log of "Error running: ufw allow in log from 192.168.0.0/24 3389 > ERROR: Wrong number of arguments". Gufw appears to be trying to run the command: "ufw allow in log from 192.168.0.0/24 3389" which errors but compare this with the syntax of ufw which would be "ufw allow in log from 192.168.0.0/24 to any port 3389". This works successfully so it looks like Gufw is presenting incorrect syntax for this configuration in this version. To manage notifications about this bug go to: https://bugs.launchpad.net/gui-ufw/+bug/1540077/+subscriptions _______________________________________________ Mailing list: https://launchpad.net/~gufw-developers Post to : gufw-developers@lists.launchpad.net Unsubscribe : https://launchpad.net/~gufw-developers More help : https://help.launchpad.net/ListHelp
