"Dr. Arne Babenhauserheide" <arne_...@web.de> writes: > Mike Gran <spk...@yahoo.com> writes: >> bootstrapped with the bitrotten guts of what we had before to get back >> to a working `make check`. From here, it might be simple to extract >> the old 64-bit patch and incorporate the Lilypond patch set in whole or >> in part. I don't know yet. I haven't tried it. > … >> - rlb expressed the importance of ensuring the ABI on Debian versions of >> Guile don't change with minor revisions, so I think he'd like to see > … >> - janneke indicated that in the past, the *.go files were identical for > … >> - the Guix project does cross-build MinGW packages on their CI/CD, so > … >> - and spk121 (me) wants Guile to be buildable using the native tools of >> Cygwin and MSYS2's MINGW32 and UCRT64 toolchains > … >> there. Just a bit more time. But if another Guile committer wants to >> champion the Lilypond patchset and push it, that's fine by me. No need >> to wait on me. > > I wish I could champion it, but as I can’t (I have no Windows skills or > experience to speak of), I’d just like to ask whether there was progress > off-list. > > Also: thank you for championing the inclusion of the patchset!
Did you push your working make check to some branch people can test? Best wishes, Arne -- Unpolitisch sein heißt politisch sein, ohne es zu merken. draketo.de
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
