Hi Maxime, I hope someone responds to you in a better way.
In the meantime I might go for a stroll among some trees [1] see a golden GNU [2] or listen to a tragic song. [3] The world ain't half bad. Actually, the world is good! At least we have ice cream [4] and maybe a way to laugh at others and at ourselves. Kind regards Felix [1] https://www.jeparsauxusa.com/humboldt-redwoods-state-park/ [2] https://animals.sandiegozoo.org/animals/takin [3] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9vST6hVRj2A [4] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=oZxz5LM25BU On Thu, Aug 21 2025, Maxime Devos wrote: > Guile doesn't have a formalised code of conduct, but that doesn't mean > all is acceptable. Non-hypothetically, I'd hope you agree the > following are bad > > 1 presuming entitlement to others' time (especially in the case where > you request them to do something you are slow at, and already took a > long time to do something else) > 2 in the face of evidence to the contrary of some claim, ignore that > evidence as if it didn't happen and re-iterate that claim (without any > attempt at all to disprove the evidence) > 3 claiming someone else is bad for not acquiescing to (1) > 4 claiming someone else (X) wasted their (Y) time -- despite (1), > despite Y requesting quality, and despite X spending a lot of time on > something for Y > 5 not realizing the hypocrisy > 6 keeping digging deeper > > Considering the above, and that this individual has already been > warned about unacceptable for their unacceptable behaviour in the > past, with no sign of improvement and with disagreement on the > acceptability, it seems time for more definite measures, yet there > isn't a clear point of contact for such matters. > > Best regards, > Maxime Devos
