Neil Jerram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ludovic Courtès) writes: > >> The patch below fixes these two things. It also comments out the >> `elisp' test which results in a stack overflow here. My understanding >> is that the Elisp work is almost only due to Neil has never been widely >> used, so hopefully it won't hurt too much until a better solution is >> found. > > That's correct. I'll see if I can debug this, though, so that the > test can then be reinstated. Thanks for pointing it out.
Actually I'm not sure I understand. Do you see the stack overflow only after applying your patch, or did it occur before the patch also on your system? I don't see a problem on Intel using current CVS. Thanks, Neil _______________________________________________ Guile-devel mailing list Guile-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-devel
