Greg Troxel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > follow the BSD way, and translate 0.0.0.x/8 in the second arg into > setting imr_ifindex on Linux. > > follow the Linux way, and make it a vector of 3 and translate back > into the 0.0.0.x/8 on BSD. > > I prefer the first way, since this is orginally a BSD interface and > because it's less burdensome
Is there a good reason for linux to split it out? Some ambiguity resolved or something? > those who are blissfully unaware of this complexity, as I suspect > you wish you still were. Yep :-). > The code I submitted just puts the two addresses in the two fields; > someone could spiff it up for ifindex support on Linux if they were so > inclined. Be nice to make sure it worked at least. _______________________________________________ Guile-devel mailing list Guile-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-devel
