> > Given that things don't work with 1.6.8.rc0 even after changing __ia64__ > > to IA64 I think it is reasonable not to address this problem for 1.6.8. > > Well, if we can do it safely and fairly easily, I'd still be inclined > to add the code for ucontext_t on HP-UX because that lowers the bar > for future progress. Is there a sufficiently specific test that you > think might be appropriate?
Well the test for IA64 and not HP-UX would be "defined(__ia64) && !defined(__hpux)". __hpux and __ia64 are defined by both the HP compilers and GCC on IA64 HP-UX. __hpux__ and __ia64__ are only defined by GCC. IA64 Linux GCC defines __ia64 and __ia64__ but not any of the hpux macros. > Well if your needs aren't short-to-medium term, or if your intended > purpose can handle a potentially very unstable guile, then you might > want to focus on CVS HEAD (i.e. 1.7). However, if you need something > stable, then 1.6 is it. Sounds like 1.6 is more in line with what I want (1.6.9 if not 1.6.8). Steve Ellcey [EMAIL PROTECTED] _______________________________________________ Guile-devel mailing list Guile-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-devel
