[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
> Marius Vollmer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>> (oop goops util) is not meant to be used outside the goops
>> implementation. I'd rather not touch it for cosmetic purposes
>> only... :-)
>
> Sure, but why re-implement a subset of SRFI-1 in there, especially
> non-tail-recursive variants?
Couldn't we then remove any and every from util.scm, and change
goops.scm to use (srfi srfi-1)? This will catch anyone who has used
(oop goops util) to get any/every, but that's an odd thing to do and
we can cover it in a NEWS item.
Regards,
Neil
_______________________________________________
Guile-devel mailing list
Guile-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-devel
