Rob Browning <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > Does anyone know what the arguments are, if any, for implementing > delay and force directly in eval.c rather than more generically, at > the Scheme level, perhaps in boot-9.scm via define-record, lambda, > etc.?
I imagine some C code is less bytes for a promise object. (Speaking of which, I'd thought before that once a promise is forced it shouldn't need a mutex any more, which would save a bit of time and space.) _______________________________________________ Guile-devel mailing list Guile-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-devel
