Bruce Korb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > It turns out that in all places where I was using scm_makstr(), I > was also using SCM_CHARS to access the string memory and then fill > it in. It *must* be safe to do because I don't call any scheme > functions before I am done scribbling in the memory.
I would like to reproduce this. Could you give me instructions for how to do that? What you describe _ought_ to work. If we can't get SCM_CHARS / SCM_STRING_CHARS to work we might as well remove it. -- GPG: D5D4E405 - 2F9B BCCC 8527 692A 04E3 331E FAF8 226A D5D4 E405 _______________________________________________ Guile-devel mailing list Guile-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-devel
