Neil Jerram <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > How about renaming the internal scm_frame functions instead, since > AFAIK they haven't been released yet?
Yep, I'll do that. > Perhaps scm_context_..., or scm_dynwind_..., or scm_dc_...? I'm going with scm_dynwind_ since the functions are directly related to 'dynwind'. -- GPG: D5D4E405 - 2F9B BCCC 8527 692A 04E3 331E FAF8 226A D5D4 E405 _______________________________________________ Guile-devel mailing list Guile-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-devel
