Kevin Ryde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > I made some memory leak checks for myself by demanding that > "(assoc-ref (gc-stats) 'bytes-malloced)" was steady across some > repetitions of a test. That's actually a different number though (is > it?), but it should in theory be possible to exercise some of the > malloc/free counting or balancing (post 1.8 that is :-).
I'm not sure doing so would be that easy because `bytes-malloced' follows a periodic distribution whose period is unknown (i.e., each call to `scm_take_locale_stringn ()' makes it slightly increase, and each mark/sweep sequence -- which is occurs roughly periodically -- changes it back to a much lower value). Thanks, Ludovic. _______________________________________________ Guile-devel mailing list Guile-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-devel
