Hi, Kevin Ryde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> That bit sounds fair, I it in. I think the rest labours the point a > little. Sorry, I'm not sure I understand what you mean. > Hopefully seeing init-thunk and init-form described is > enough. I think the [EMAIL PROTECTED] across all new instances of the class}' is the least I would expect from the documentation. Then perhaps the example that follows is just too much, too trivial. Is it what you mean? Thanks, Ludovic. _______________________________________________ Guile-devel mailing list Guile-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-devel
