Kevin Ryde <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> The subject of _exit() as opposed to exit() has come up before. I
> propose to add _exit as a `primitive-primitive-exit', so you can
> really get out of a process straight away, with no C or Scheme level
> stuff. The docs would be per below, adding the existing but
> undocumented plain `exit' too.
>
> Not sure about the name primitive-primitive-exit. It's pretty ugly,
> but something shorter like `_exit' would make the heirarchy of exits a
> lot less obvious.
How about primitive-_exit ? It's a little odd, but I think will be
intuitive to anyone looking for _exit. I know we don't conventionally
use underscores in Scheme, but I don't think doing so will break
anything.
The doc is great.
Neil
_______________________________________________
Guile-devel mailing list
Guile-devel@gnu.org
http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-devel
