Hi, "Mikael Djurfeldt" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Yet, as long as the current GC is more efficient (as measured by > performance tests), there is no reason to switch, right? Well, it's still unclear whether the current GC is more efficient, and how much more if it is. Furthermore, the GBGC code is a few weeks old so it may be possible to tune it a bit more. IMO, although I'm quite concerned with performance, I don't think it should be the only criterion: maintainability and portability are important as well. The fact that Bigloo uses BGC also tends to reassure me: if Guile can someday perform as bad as Bigloo compiled code (or simply, as bad as its interpreter), then I'll be very happy. ;-) Thanks, Ludovic. _______________________________________________ Guile-devel mailing list Guile-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-devel
