On Wed, 2006-05-31 at 10:49 +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > You can get it from my Arch archive: > > $ tla register-archive http://www.laas.fr/~lcourtes/software/arch-2005 > $ tla get -A [EMAIL PROTECTED] guile-core--boehm-gc--1.9 \ > guile-core--bgc > > A tarball and a diff against current CVS HEAD are also available: > > > http://www.laas.fr/~lcourtes/software/arch-2005/guile-core/guile-core--boehm-gc/guile-core--boehm-gc--1.9/patch-35/guile-core--boehm-gc--1.9--patch-35.tar.gz > > http://www.laas.fr/~lcourtes/software/guile/guile-core--bgc--patch-35.diff.gz > > SHA1 sums: > > 6b6867dc637a24d7f9f25f99fb7d81c8a54b9190 guile-core--bgc--patch-35.diff.gz > 4a54c2489dbca7e5415be788c3d1fdc9884584f9 > guile-core--boehm-gc--1.9--patch-35.tar.gz >
Your patch touches a lot of files and reverts them to older versions. Could you resync with cvs head, and send another patch with only the real changes? If you don't have time I can do it. Has anyone actually tried testing the performance of a real guile program with the patch yet? -- http://unknownlamer.org Jabber: [EMAIL PROTECTED] AIM:unknownlamer IRC:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Real Men use Free Software; Open Source is for tools 443E 4F1A E213 7C54 A306 E328 7601 A1F0 F403 574B
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
_______________________________________________ Guile-devel mailing list Guile-devel@gnu.org http://lists.gnu.org/mailman/listinfo/guile-devel
